Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us

Dan Pink presents great insight into the gap between what science knows and what business does about motivation. Using a variety of metaphors to clearly state his arguments, Pink makes a compelling case for recognizing that management approaches based on compliance are not going to serve organizations well in the new world of work that is evolving with our changing business and economic environment.

The central thesis is laid out neatly – humans need three things to motivate themselves: autonomy, mastery, and purpose. These are the drivers of intrinsic motivation, which Pink argues is critical for any non-algorithmic work (not just creative work, but anything that is non-repetitive or that involves problem solving).

After the preliminary groundwork is presented, a chapter is dedicated to each element (autonomy, mastery, purpose). Scientific studies – often with counter-intuitive results – are peppered throughout the book and support Pink’s arguments quite nicely. Of course, this works well because there are no counter-arguments presented to this case. Instead, there are a series of recaps and exercises designed to help reinforce Pink’s thesis.

The book is very well-written, compelling, and thought-provoking. I consider it a must-read for those who wish to contemplate the way the business world is evolving.

If you enjoy the book (or if you need more to explore before purchasing), be sure to watch his TED Talk on this topic, and the RSA animation video as well.

Related posts:

  1. Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard
  • http://kmamikegil-blog.kma-llc.net/ Mike Gilronan

    Loved this book, Tom, blogged on it, and think about it a lot as we (for example) formulate project teams. It represents a fresh view of motivation that, apparently, not everyone unanimously shares: http://aubreydanielsblog.com/2010/01/26/drive-me-crazy/ (nice tempest in a teapot here). Glad your holiday weekend included some good reading!

  • Tom Catalini

    Mike,

    Thanks for the comment and that link – I’ve bookmarked it for reading later. Looks like a two-part series with some good discussion. The bits I’ve read that attack Drive do seem like they have their own flaws, but at the same time I think Pink was trying to make a higher-level point and not present a scientific caliber work. As I stated my own review, Pink’s argument is definitely one-sided. And at times it’s a little over the top. But, I think it’s a great and very useful book with some solid ideas, well-presented.

    Tom

  • Pingback: Flow